Planes v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
652 F.3d 991 · 2011
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Booker · Jones v. Bock · Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · United States v. Ameline · United States v. Goldenberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any requirement that all direct appeals be exhausted or waived.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has suggested that the definition of the word 'conviction,' added to the immigration laws in 1996, 'eliminate[d] the requirement that all direct appeals be exhausted or waived before a conviction is considered final”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the enactment of a statutory definition for 'conviction' in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.