Shirley A. Duberry v. Postmaster General’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. A · Timson v. Sampson · Tannenbaum v. United States · Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster · Shiver v. Chertoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because [the plaintiff] makes no argument that she did not abandon her contract claim or that the district court otherwise erred in implicitly disposing of it, any breach-of-contract argument has been abandoned on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.