652 F. Supp. 301 - Ward v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · Herweg v. Ray · Vance v. Hegstrom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n his effort to support his interpretation on including sibling income, the Secretary makes interesting, but nonetheless tortured and meritless, attempts to evade the Medicaid restrictions of subsections (17)(B) and (D)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ince Medicaid eligibility is linked to eligibility for AFDC, Medicaid savings are also anticipated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whose parent or legal guardian is under the age of 18 ... include any income of such minor's own parents or legal guardians who are living in the same home as such minor and dependent child, to the same extent that income of a stepparent is included under paragraph (31).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olson v. Norman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.