Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 N.E.2d 552 - Salone v. State

Salone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2014

16 state decisions

90199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spencer v. Brown · Fugate v. State · Jenkins v. State · Rhinehardt v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arising out of an episode of criminal conduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the shooting, but the exact date of their meeting is unknown. Quarles did not testify at trial, so the jury heard no evidence from the victim as to how long he used his crutches, wore his brace, experienced pain, or otherwise suffered loss or impairment of the function of his leg. The State argues that the jurors could infer as a matter of common knowledge that the nature of Quarles's injury resulted in protracted loss or impairment of the function of his leg. 4 Appellee's Br. at 5-6. To be sure,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “such burned skin 'can' constrict, and a 'lot of times' cause secondary contraction which 'maybe' will result in an inability to fully expand the hand, thus 'usually' necessitating physical therapy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.