Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 NW2D 327 - Byzewski v. R.O.

Byzewski v. R.O.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Castillo v. D.Z. · In Interest of JS · State v. Waters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[¶ 9] The district court had jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-03. This Court has jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-29. II [¶ 10] Our review of an involuntary commitment order is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re RO
  2. “with less than twenty-four hours' notice, R.O.'s attorney would not have had sufficient time to gather the information from her client and find physicians to testify on R.O.'s behalf.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a less restrictive environment is not feasible at this time due to the severity of his chemical dependency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re RO

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.