State v. Maestas’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2012
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 62 Ill. 2d 568 - People v. Viser · 79 Wash. 2d 512 - State v. Randecker · State v. Howell · State v. Romero · 2 Utah 2d 281 - State v. Penderville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acts with the 'kind of culpability otherwise required " for the underlying offense. Id. at 845 (quoting Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-101 (1)). The court construed that language "to refer to the attendant cireumstances, if any, of the underlying offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“from the common law rule that intent is a necessary element of every 'attempt' crime even where the corresponding completed crime does not require intent as an element.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Casey“Id. at 905 . Where an intent to commit the particular crime committed is an element of the completed crime, the same intent requirement applies to the corresponding”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Casey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.