Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 SE2D 344 - In Re BE

In Re BE’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission · Scarborough v. Fischer · 77 N.C. App. 110 - In Re Bass · Matter of Vinson · 143 N.C. App. 712 - In Re Eades

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the following facts have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause the trial court has already made its determinations as to the credibility of the witnesses and has weighed the evidence, we do not require a new hearing. Rather, we remand to the trial court for clarification of the standard of proof used in the adjudication order.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “are mandatory and that it is reversible error for a trial court to fail to state affirmatively that an adjudication of delinquency is based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.