Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 SO2D 1197 - Hall v. State

Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 645 So. 2d 1 - Tomlinson v. State · Hart v. State · Fitts v. State · 650 So. 2d 697 - Stark v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DOES THE SUPREME COURT’S PROMULGATION OP THE FORM “ORDER OF PROBATION” IN FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.986 CONSTITUTE SUFFICIENT NOTICE TO PROBATIONERS OF CONDITIONS 1-11 SUCH THAT ORAL PRONOUNCEMENT OF THESE CONDITIONS BY THE TRIAL COURT IS UNNECESSARY?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “You will not use intoxicants to excess or possess any drugs or narcotics unless prescribed by a physician. Nor will you visit places where intoxicants, drugs or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “You will neither possess, carry or own any weapons or firearms. You will not possess, carry or own any weapons without first procuring the consent of your [probation] officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.