Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 SO2D 175 - Jones v. Wiese

Jones v. Wiese’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McFee v. State · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · 595 So. 2d 1310 - Roberson v. State · King v. Ahrens · Teche Lines, Inc. v. Bounds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to parts of the evidence and not to the entire evidence which support[ed] the verdict, and it [was] a comment upon the weight of the evidence ... [which could] conceivably exclude circumstantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “court instructs the jury that any evidence which tends only to show a possibility is no evidence at all and must be disregarded by you in reaching your verdict”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[Y]ou may not allow or award any damages to the Plaintiff for any alleged injuries that only possibly resulted from the happening of the accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.