Havard v. Havard’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 521 So. 2d 13 - McCollum v. Reeves · 589 So. 2d 738 - Ladewig v. Moxley · 479 So. 2d 1292 - Durham v. Heck · 630 So. 2d 67 - Rubrigi v. Rubrigi · 516 So. 2d 702 - Jackson v. Weaver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a trial court receives evidence ore tenus in a case involving a child support arrearage, its judgment is presumed correct and will not be reversed on appeal unless the judgment is plainly and palpably wrong. Rubrigi v. Rubrigi, 630 So.2d 67 (Ala.Civ.App.1993). The determination of an amount of child support arrearage and the disposition thereof is largely a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court. Id.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.