Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 SO2D 419 - Emond v. State

Emond v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Beasley · Nank v. State · 645 So. 2d 1 - Tomlinson v. State · Hart v. State · Jennings v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DOES THE SUPREME COURT’S PROMULGATION OF THE FORM “ORDER OF PROBATION” IN FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.986 CONSTITUTE SUFFICIENT NOTICE TO PROBATIONERS OF CONDITIONS 1-11 SUCH THAT ORAL PRONOUNCEMENT OF THESE CONDITIONS BY THE TRIAL COURT IS UNNECESSARY?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It would seem that publication of the Rules of Court should provide the same type of constructive notice which the supreme court found to be provided by publication of the Florida Statutes in State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.