Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 So. 2d 778 - Wilson v. State

652 So. 2d 778 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Tibbs v. Florida · Powers v. Ohio · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB · Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While it is never proper for the prosecutor to express his personal opinion as to the guilt of the accused during closing argument, reversible error does not occur when the argument complained of constitutes mere expression of opinion concerning inferences, deductions and conclusions drawn from the evidence. See Woods v. State, 19 Ala. App. 299 , 97 So. 179 (1923); Mitchell v. State, 50 Ala.App. 121 , 277 So.2d 395 , cert. denied, 291 Ala. 794 , 277 So.2d 404 (1973); Mainor v. State, 339 So.2d 147 (Ala.Crim.App. 1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “` Sams v. State, 506 So.2d 1027, 1029 (Ala.Cr.App.1986).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.