Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

652 So. 2d 935

Valdez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-03-31

Relies on State v. Sanderson · Paxson v. State

Decided 1995-03-31

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the imposition of restitution, but remand for a hearing to determine the amount. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993); Crosby v. State, 637 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the trial court is also directed to reconsider its cost order to conform with this court’s recent decision in Reyes v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D467,-So.2d-[1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).

FRANK, C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
/652/so2d/935 · .json · Public domain