Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 So. 2d 964 - Kline v. Rubio

652 So. 2d 964 - Kline v. Rubio’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2014

10 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 581 So. 2d 1305 - State v. James · 569 So. 2d 1273 - First Fidelity Bank, N.A., New Jersey v. District Court of Appeal, Fourth District · 498 So. 2d 882 - Fisher v. Shenandoah General Construction Co. · Eller v. Shova · 498 So. 2d 879 - Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “exhibit[ed] a deliberate intent to injure [n]or ... [were] substantially certain to result in injury or death”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “First of all, gross negligence presupposes the existence of a composite of circumstances which, together, constitute an imminent or clear and present danger amounting to more than normal and usual ... peril ... Secondly, gross negligence must be predicated on a showing of chargeable knowledge or awareness of the imminent danger spoken of. And thirdly, the act or omission complained of must occur in a manner which evinces a conscious disregard of consequences, as distinguished from a careless disregard thereof (as in simple negligence) or from the more extreme willful or wanton disregard thereof (as in culpable or criminal negligence). 65”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.