Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 SW2D 102 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 110 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2009 · most notably State v. Ervin (1992), State v. Parker (1994)

16 federal appellate · 110 state decisions

810198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Gregg v. Georgia · Smith v. Goguen · Frisbie v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the evidence has come to the knowledge of the defendant since the trial; (2) it was not owing to want of due diligence that it was not discovered sooner; (3) the evidence is so material that it would probably produce a different result on a new trial; and (4) it is not cumulative only or merely impeaching the credit of the witness.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Number One, that the murder of Kathy Allen was committed for the purpose of avoiding a lawful arrest of defendant and, second, that the murder of Kathy Allen was committed while the defendant was engaged in the perpetration of a kidnapping and, third, that Kathy Allen was a potential witness in a pending investigation of the kidnapping of Kathy Allen, and was killed as a result of her status as a potential witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The unlawful act need not be the immediate cause of death. It is enough that it be a contributing proximate cause, although other contributing causes may have intervened.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.