Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

652 S.W.2d 184

Ort v. Ort

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1983

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1983-04-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1985

2 state decisions

Relies on Bull v. Bull · Nilges v. Nilges · Madden v. Madden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CRIST, Judge.

¶1Marriage dissolution after eight years, both parties 55 years of age and having been previously married. Husband appeals. We affirm.

¶2Husband complains about a $500.00 monthly maintenance award to wife. Wife is physically disabled, marginally educated and marginally trained. She has not worked for several years. Husband had a take home pay from employment of approximately $1,300.00. Our reading of the transcript convinces us the trial court followed the guidelines of § 452.335, RSMo.1978. Bull v. Bull, 634 S.W.2d 228, 229 (Mo.App.1982).

¶3Husband also complains about the division of marital property. Husband does not show great disparity in the division of marital property. Our reading of the transcript convinces us the division of property was just and in accordance with § 452.330, RSMo.1978. Nilges v. Nilges, 610 S.W.2d 58 (Mo.App.1980) and Madden v. Madden, 585 S.W.2d 220 (Mo.App.1979).

¶4The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

¶5Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD, J., concur.
/652/sw2d/184 · .json · Public domain