Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

652 S.W.2d 244

State v. Peck

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1983

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1983-05-04

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1994

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““Missouri has long had the rule that a defendant who escapes or flees the jurisdiction of its courts either during trial or in the process of post-trial proceedings forfeits his rights to an appeal upon the merits of the cause.” ... In one form or another, this principle is recognized by most courts, including the United States Supreme Court.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including State v. Gillispie, Branch v. Turner

Relies on State v. Carter · Wayne v. Wyrick · State v. Logan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

TITUS, Judge.

¶1Defendant was jury-convicted of burglary in the second degree, a class C felony. § 569.170.1 Having been charged as a persistent offender and so found by the court,2 defendant was sentenced to a 15 year term of imprisonment. § 558.016. Defendant appealed.

¶2Pursuant to Rules 30.16 and 33.01, defendant applied to the circuit court for release pending appeal and on June 15, 1982, defendant was freed on a $25,000 bond. In accordance with our Special Rule 5, on February 10, 1983, defendant and his surety were ordered to report and appear in person in this court on February 17,1983. On that date the surety appeared but announced he could not produce the defendant. This court then ordered defendant and his bondsman to appear on February 24, 1983. Upon the latter date the defendant again did not appear and per Rule 33.14 the bond was declared forfeited and the release of defendant upon appeal was revoked. Also on February 24, 1983, this court issued its Warrant for Arrest and Sentence to Division of Corrections. Defendant has never been apprehended and his whereabouts since his failure to appear in this court as directed, supra, is unknown.

¶3Missouri has long had the rule that a defendant who escapes or flees the jurisdiction of its courts either during trial or in the process of post-trial proceedings forfeits his rights to an appeal upon the merits of the cause. State v. Logan, 125 Mo. 22, 28 S.W. 176 (1894); State v. Carter, 98 Mo. 431, 11 S.W. 979 (1889). If a defendant either escapes or flees the jurisdiction during his trial or during post-trial proceedings, he relinquishes his right of appeal. Wayne v. Wyrick, 646 F.2d 1268, 1270[2] (8th Cir.1981); State v. Lafata, 614 S.W.2d 27, 29[5] (Mo.App.1981); Wayne v. State, 579 S.W.2d 780, 781[3] (Mo.App.1979); White v. State, 558 S.W.2d 372, 375[7] (Mo.App.1977).

¶4The appeal herein is dismissed and the judgment nisi is affirmed.

FLANIGAN, P.J., GREENE, C.J., and CROW, J., concur.

¶5. Statutory and rule references are to RSMo 1978 and to Missouri Rules of Court (14th ed. 1983).

¶6. State v. Peck, 545 S.W.2d 725 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Peck, 536 S.W.2d 511 (Mo.App.1976).

/652/sw2d/244 · .json · Public domain