Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 652 S.W.2d 464 - Benavides v. State

Benavides v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Gordon v. Lake · White v. State · Brewster v. State · Standard v. Sadler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We agree with the holding in Bass and Ragan [v. State, 649 S.W.2d 662 ] because we are of the opinion that there is no new substantive matter connected with, or relevant to, the main subject of the act which the caption does not encompass. To hold otherwise would require that the caption of H.B. 730 contain more subject matter than the act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.