Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 A.2d 417 - Thomas v. Thompson

Thomas v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2021

8 state decisions

601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wescott v. Allstate Insurance · Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co. · Mockus v. Melanson · Firth v. City of Rockland · Hamby v. Thomas Realty Associates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thompson went to considerable lengths to assure a timely response to the cause of action against him. In addition to forwarding the summons and complaint to his insurer promptly, Thompson thereafter contacted his insurer to inquire about the case. When he was told that the company could not locate the information he sent them, he responded by arranging for a facsimile transmission of the documents to his insurer. In short, Thompson did everything that one could reasonably ask an insured to do to assure a timely response.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Consistent with this preference, we note that under Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(c), which is identical to M.R. Civ. P. 55(c), motions to set aside a default have been granted in cases when no gross neglect was involved in the late filing, the non-defaulting party will not be substantially prejudiced by reopening the case, and a meritorious defense exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “excusable neglect standard of Rule 60(b)(1) is more stringent than the good cause standard of Rule 55(c)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.