Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 F.2d 1010 - Grandberry v. Bonner

Grandberry v. Bonner’s Empirical Analysis

653 F.2d 1010 · 1981

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Evans v. State (1997), United States v. Bates (1990)

17 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

16019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · Illinois v. Somerville · United States v. Josef Perez · Cherry v. Director, State Board of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the forefront the defendant's valued right 'of being able, once and for all, to conclude his confrontation with society through the verdict of a tribunal he might believe to be favorably disposed to his fate.' " United States v. Starling, 571 F.2d 934 , 938 (5th Cir.1978) (quoting Jorn, 400 U.S. at 486, 91 S.Ct. at 558). 28 Although the "manifest necessity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(T)he pace at which the proceedings culminating in the judge's declaration of a mistrial moved indicates that the judge could not possibly have considered carefully any alternatives to declaring a mistrial. It was only a matter of minutes....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Brady v. Samaha, 667 F.2d 224 , 229 (1st Cir.1981). See Grandberry, 653 F.2d at 1015-16; Cherry v. Director, State Board of Corrections, 635 F.2d 414 , 417-18 (5th Cir.1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.