National Labor Relations Board v. Keystone Steel & Wire, Division of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
653 F.2d 304 · 1981
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2015
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc. · Thompson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to create 'a restoration of the situation, as nearly as possible, to that which would have obtained' but for the unfair labor practices.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. Marine Corporation and Bayliner Marine Corporation, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervening International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board · US Marine Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board“some employees ultimately may receive greater benefits than they would have received if the Company had not acted illegally”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. Marine Corporation and Bayliner Marine Corporation, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervening International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board · US Marine Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board“correcting a unilateral change in a term or condition of employment”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. Marine Corporation and Bayliner Marine Corporation, Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervening International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board · US Marine Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.