Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 F.2d 310 - Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. Liang

Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. Liang’s Empirical Analysis

653 F.2d 310 · 1981

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
10
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 5 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Stroh Container Company v. Delphi Industries Inc Delphi Industries Inc (1986), Miller Brewing Company v. Brewery Workers Local Union No (1984)

35 federal appellate · 5 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 10 states

38019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Rideout v. United States · Wilko v. Swan · Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The arbitrators gave no reasons for their award, but they are not required to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[f]ailure to consider credibility evidence is not a ground for vacation of an award,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.