Franklin v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
653 F.2d 362 · 1981
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2254 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez · Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States · Fulford v. Klein · Meadows v. Evans · White v. Bloom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Franklin asserts in his response to the show cause order that the district court improperly applied the abstention doctrine to this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bressman v. Farrier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.