Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 F.2d 384 - United States v. Moore

United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

653 F.2d 384 · 1981

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
March 2003
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably United States v. Foster (1983), United States v. Frazin (1986)

24 federal appellate ·

180198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Barker v. Wingo · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Blackledge v. Perry · Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a sense of frustration at the jury's failure to reach a verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.