Satchell v. Cardwell’s Empirical Analysis
653 F.2d 408 · 1981
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Butcher v. Marquez (1985), United States v. Ramirez-Sandoval (1989)
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chapman v. State of California · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)lthough a suppression motion might have been successful, the issue was so close that it cannot be said that a reasonably competent attorney could not have failed to make such a motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where this court has suppressed [testimonial] evidence, the testimony was that of persons implicated in the criminal activity revealed by the illegal search; the court stressed that there was no indication that they would have come forward of their own volition or been discovered through another source. United States v. Rubalcava-Montoya, 597 F.2d 140, 143-44 (9th Cir.1978). The situation is different where the witness was a brutally beaten multiple-rape victim who [probably would have been discovered].””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“reflect a failure to exercise the skill, judgment, or diligence of a reasonably competent criminal defense attorney--they must be errors a reasonably competent attorney acting as a diligent conscientious advocate would not have made ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.