United States v. Bingham’s Empirical Analysis
653 F.3d 983 · 2011
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 1959 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.