Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

653 F. App'x 784

Mitchell v. Rivera

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2016

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2016-05-31

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2016-05-31

¶1Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Marshall Lee Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s July 3, 2014 order dismissing Mitchell’s Bivens * action against Defendants. Mitchell has also filed a motion asking that all Judges of this court recuse themselves from his appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Mitchell v. Rivera, No. 4:13-cv-01949-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 13, 2015). We also deny Mitchell’s motion for recusal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

¶5 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

/653/fappx/784 · .json · Public domain