Balthazor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1987
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Henry · Cardwell v. Workman · United States v. Thomas · Hawley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ojnce a criminal defendant has either retained an attorney or had an attorney appointed for him by the court, any statement obtained by interview from such defendant may not be offered in evidence for any purpose unless the accused’s attorney was notified of the interview which produced the statement and was given a reasonable opportunity to be present. To hold otherwise, we think, would be to overlook conduct which violated both the letter and spirit of the canons of ethics. This is obviously not something which the defendant alone can waive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Depp v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.