Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 SO2D 1122 - McNeal v. State

McNeal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2014

7 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 457 So. 2d 1385 - State v. Overfelt · 573 So. 2d 813 - Lareau v. State · State v. Tripp · Brown v. State · Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before you can find the defendant, Henry Anthony Dozier, guilty of Aggravated Battery under Count One of the Information, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt.... 1. Henry Anthony Dozier intentionally touched or struck Waymon Williams against his will. 2. Henry Anthony Dozier in committing the battery intentionally or knowingly caused great bodily harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement to Waymon Williams, and in so doing used a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In other words, the jury's options on the verdict form were limited so that if they were to convict of aggravated battery at all, the verdict form required them to also find use of a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]ntentionally or knowingly cause[d] great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.