653 So. 2d 174 - State v. Pratt’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 79 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 966 So. 2d 139 - State v. Ellis (2007), 954 So. 2d 823 - State v. Grant (2007)
1 federal appellate · 79 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sullivan v. Louisiana · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · State v. Wry · 601 So. 2d 656 - State v. Brewington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. The two nephews that got arrested in Houston, you went with them over there didn’t you? A. Sir? Q. You went with the two nephews to Houston didn’t you? A. Yes, sir. Q. You were also going over there to get some drugs weren’t you? A. No, sir.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pratt v. Cain“relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Salter“State v. Moore, 575 So.2d 928 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.