Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 SO2D 489 - Langston v. Jamerson

Langston v. Jamerson’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2013

9 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 642 So. 2d 1081 - Legal Assistance v. Bd. of Brevard Cty. · 480 So. 2d 150 - Holmes v. Turlington · 600 So. 2d 1187 - Forehand v. School Bd. of Gulf County · 629 So. 2d 226 - MacMillan v. Nassau County School Bd. · 399 So. 2d 103 - Jenkins v. State Bd. of Ed.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally the construction of a regulation by the agency charged with its enforcement and interpretation is entitled to great deference, but the court need not defer to the agency's construction when that construction amounts to an unreasonable interpretation, or is clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The question whether the facts, as found in the recommended order and adopted by the EPVC, constituted violations of these rules, was a question of ultimate fact which the agency erred in rejecting without adequate explanation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is a factual question to be decided in the context of the alleged violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.