653 So. 2d 526 - State v. Maxie’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
101 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate (2003), 684 So. 2d 368 - State v. Seals (1996)
101 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hudson v. Louisiana · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · 420 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Graham · 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown · State v. Brown“The ... defendant may challenge a juror for cause on the ground that: . . . . The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and the court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and evidence; . . . . The juror will not accept the law as given to him by the court....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“In order to confirm a conviction, an appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient for a rational fact finder to conclude that every element of the crime was proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.