State v. Crossley’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · 643 So. 2d 1289 - State v. Kershaw · 438 So. 2d 1091 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) As to the law applicable to the case; (2) That the jury is the judge of the law and of the facts on the question of guilt or innocence, but that it has the duty to accept and to apply the law as given by the court; and (3) That the jury alone shall determine the weight and credibility of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haddad“if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent. It need not be given if it is included in the general charge or in another special charge to be given”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haddad
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.