Vielee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
169 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 170 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State (2002), Branch v. State (2004)
169 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Leatherwood v. State · Brooks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a party offers only his affidavit, then his ineffective assistance claim is without merit.”
22 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lindsay v. State · Minchew v. State“that trial counsel's conduct is within the wide range of reasonable conduct and that decisions made by trial counsel are strategic.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Defense counsel have an ethical obligation to avoid conflicting representations and to advise the court promptly when a conflict of interest arises during the course of trial ..." Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 346-47 , 100 S.Ct. 1708, 1716 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1989[1980]). When defense counsel has breached his duty of loyalty by actively representing conflicting interests and the conflict of interest adversely affects his performance then prejudice is presumed. Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348-50 , 100 S.Ct. at 1718-19 . See also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2067 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holmes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.