Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 SO2D 945 - Ex Parte Neely

Ex Parte Neely’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2017

12 state decisions

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Clarke · Sullivan v. Russell Corp. · 350 So. 2d 405 - Alabama Youth Services Bd. v. Ellis · Ex Parte City of Birmingham · 621 So. 2d 1282 - Jefferson County v. SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[W]here an officer of the state is a defendant, as in this case, or where an agency of the state is a defendant, venue is proper only in Montgomery County, `absent specific statutory authority to the contrary or waiver of objection to venue' and `even where the case arguably is one involving real estate in another county.'"”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In proceedings of an equitable nature against individuals: (1) [a]ll actions where real estate is the subject matter of the action, whether it is the exclusive subject matter of the action or not, must be commenced in the county where the same or a material portion thereof is situated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “absent statutory authority to the contrary, venue for ... actions against a state agency or a state officer should be in the county of the official residence of the agency or officer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.