Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 SW2D 69 - Kenneally v. Thurn

Kenneally v. Thurn’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2017

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2651

Relies on Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Dunn · City of Austin v. Daniels · Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. Page · Impson v. Structural Metals, Inc. · Lorig v. City of Mission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is sufficient evidence to raise a question of fact as to whether the condition had existed for such a length of time that City, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered it. The photographs introduced in evidence showed that the bushes were scraggly, indicating that they had not been trimmed in some time. One of the residents in the area testified that the bushes had been there as long as she could remember. The evidence also showed that various police officers of the City, while on routine patrol, drove through the intersection, driving in an easterly direction, several times a month.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “plaintiffs are entitled to a comparison of the extent of the causal negligence of all parties to the suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.