Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 653 SW2D 850 - Garza v. State

Garza v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2017

4 state decisions

201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. State · Ferguson v. State · Palafox v. State · Gorman v. State · Adams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The legislature did not provide any further definition of ‘exercise control,’ which itself is an alternative means of ‘appropriation’ under the theft statute. Tex.Penal Code Ann. sec. 31.01, 31.03 (Vernon Supp.1982). The indictment need not be more specific as to how the appellant exercised control over the ring. It gave the appellant sufficient notice of the nature of the accusation....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(B) to acquire or otherwise exercise control over property other than real property.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.