Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron’s Empirical Analysis
654 F.2d 1187 · 1981
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2000 · most notably Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985), Affiliated Capital Corporation v. City of Houston J (1984)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Hines v. Davidowitz · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Parker v. Brown · Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Courts in literally hundreds of reported cases have upheld the authority of local governments to monopolize and control local garbage collection by eliminating or restraining competition among private collectors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is difficult for us to apply the Lafayette decision since the plurality and dissenting opinions are each supported by four justices, and no line of reasoning commands a majority of the Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The old cases are not anachronisms. They are not distinguishable on any of these grounds. The solid waste disposal problem is as serious today for cities as in the past, perhaps more serious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.