Patsy Bee, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
654 F.2d 515 · 1981
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · Hedstrom Company v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Intertherm, Inc. · Red Oaks Nursing Home, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Chromalloy Mining & Minerals Alaska Division, Chromalloy American Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“economic consequences reasonably foreseeable as a result of predictable responses of [a] key customer[ ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Board finds that the possibility of erasing the effects of past practices and of ensuring a fair election (or a fair return) by the use of traditional remedies, though present, is slight and that employee sentiment once expressed through [authorization] cards would, on balance, be better protected by a bargaining order,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unfair labor practices preclude a fair and reliable election; and (2) where the union once enjoyed majority status and the unfair labor practices, although less pervasive,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.