United States v. Carrier’s Empirical Analysis
654 F.2d 559 · 1981
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably United States v. Green (1984), United States v. Ladum (1998)
53 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 31 U.S.C. § 1101 (Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010)
Relies on White v. United States · Kahm v. United States · United States v. Rose · United States v. Weatherspoon · United States v. Bedore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the specific intent of 'bringing about' the forbidden act.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“means no more than that the forbidden act is done”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Bedore is distinguished in United States v. Rose [citation omitted] where the court said that even though the statement is oral, unsworn, and unrelated to a claim against the United States, the Bedore doctrine is inapplicable because (1) the declarant was claiming a privilege of entry into the United States; (2) his statement potentially impaired the function of the Customs Services; (3) the border agent’s questions were a “routine exercise of administrative responsibility”; and (4) a truthful answer would not have involved self-incrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.