Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 654 F.2d 631 - Lewin v. Schwieker

Lewin v. Schwieker’s Empirical Analysis

654 F.2d 631 · 1981

Citation profile

135
cited by 135 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Frey v. Bowen (1987), Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2000)

68 federal appellate · 11 district ·

7301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morton v. Ruiz · Schweiker v. Hansen · Barrett v. United States · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Dobrowolsky v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If additional proceedings can remedy defects in the original administrative proceedings, a social security case should be remanded. Where, however, a rehearing would simply delay receipt of benefits, reversal [and an award of benefits] is appropriate.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[A]n examiner's findings should be as comprehensive and analytical as feasible ... so that a reviewing court may know the basis for the decision.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an explicit finding whether the Secretary believed or disbelieved the claimant....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.