Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 654 F.2d 838 - Coalition for Basic Human Needs v. King

Coalition for Basic Human Needs v. King’s Empirical Analysis

654 F.2d 838 · 1981

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Weaver v. Henderson (1993), Coalition for Basic Human Needs v. King (1982)

16 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

2001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Quern v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Rosado v. Wyman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “irreparability of harm is now excruciatingly obvious,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Our problem is that not only is case authority for constitutionally required notice based on a preparedness-for-disaster rationale apparently non-existent, but that we cannot easily envisage the kind of notice that should be expected of the Commonwealth..... [W]e doubt that pro forma notice that there might be a delay in checks because of the budgetary process would be of much help.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to take all steps that may be necessary to ensure that the second semi-monthly checks of July will issue promptly and on schedule to all AFDC recipients.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.