In re NTP, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
654 F.3d 1279 · 2011
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103
Relies on KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. · Phillips v. AWH Corp. · In re Gartside · United States v. Weiland · NTP, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A reference will be considered publicly accessible if it was disseminated or otherwise made available to the extent that persons interested and ordinarily skilled in the subject matter or art exercising reasonable diligence can locate it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his court does not reweigh evidence on appeal, but rather determines whether substantial evidence supports the [PTAB]'s fact findings,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. In a communication system comprising a wireless system which communication system transmits electronic mail inputted to the communication system from an originating device, mobile processors which execute electronic mail programming to function as a destination of electronic mail, and a destination processor to which the electronic mail is transmitted from the originating device and after reception of the electronic mail by the destination processor, information contained in the electronic mail and an identification of a wireless device in the wireless system are transmitted by the wireless system to the wireless device and from the wireless device to one of the mobile processors connected thereto, the originating device comprising: a programmed processor which executes electronic mail programming to originate the electronic mail, the electronic mail containing an address of the destination processor and the information contained in the electronic mail to be transmitted to the destination processor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re NTP, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.