Lopez v. Terrell’s Empirical Analysis
654 F.3d 176 · 2011
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from New York Northern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · United States v. Mead Corp. · Mistretta v. United States · Christensen v. Harris County
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.