← 654 F.3d 347 - Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

654 F.3d 347 · 2011

Citation profile

156

cited by 156 later decisions

June 2020

most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 23 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2107

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Bowles v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 156 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“must come forward with specific evidence demonstrating the existence of a genuine dispute of material fact.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Collins v. City of N.Y. · Rasmy v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.
“must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts, and may not rely on conclusory allegations or unsubstantiated speculation.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co. v. Wesco Ins. Co. · Rasmy v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.
“may not rely on conclusory allegations or unsubstantiated speculation,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co. v. Wesco Ins. Co. · Green v. Humana At Home, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.