Baldwin v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
654 F.3d 877 · 2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co. · WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller · Kevin Thomas Joyce Baker v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission Municipality of Anchorage · Fleck and Associates, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Phoenix, City Of, an Arizona Municipal Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Plaintiff] alleges that he objects to the “individual mandate” and does not consent to being compelled by the Act to maintain health care insurance as Congress lacks authority under Article I of the Constitution to enact such legislation. But an objection of this sort is simply a generalized grievance, for which no standing lies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Butler v. Obama
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.