Benitez v. Parmer’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P. · Wesolek ex rel. Estate of Wesolek v. Canadair Ltd. · Chance v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Merely referring the court to previously filed papers or arguments does not constitute an adequate objection under ... Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] party may serve and file specific written objections to the [magistrate judge's] proposed findings and recommendations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“general objection[s] [to be] insufficient to obtain de novo review by [a] district court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.