United States v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weil v. Neary · Hollingsworth v. Perry · Contino v. United States · 69 F. Supp. 2d 36 - United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at the very latest, upon entry of [a preliminary] order of forfeiture concerning that property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.