Griffin v. Jtsi, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “First, there must be a showing that the employee engaged in protected conduct as it is defined by the HWPA. Second, the employer is required to take some adverse action against the employee. Third, there must be a causal connection between the alleged retaliation and the whistleblowing. In other words, to meet the causal connection requirement, the employer’s challenged action must have been taken because the employee engaged in protected conduct.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lalau v. City & County of Honolulu · 937 F. Supp. 2d 1237 - You v. Longs Drugs Stores California, LLC

2. “[a] law, rule, ordinance, or regulation, adopted pursuant to law of this State, a political subdivision of this State, or the United States[.]”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 945 F. Supp. 2d 1133 - Cambron v. Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc. · Fukumoto v. State

3. “and was more efficient). In support of its motion for summary judgment, the State provided evidence that Matthews's investigation of EIRs against Fukumoto submitted by LPN Rubino and PMA Soriano resulted in the March 28, 2012 appraisal, in which Matthews concluded that Fukumoto”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Fukumoto v. State