Hampton v. Moistner’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2014
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Gregg · McKinney v. Public Service Co. of Indiana · Wright Corp. v. Quack · Carbo, Inc. v. Lowe · Sutton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a judgment on the evidence is proper only when there is a total absence of evidence in favor of the plaintiff, that is, that the evidence is without conflict and is susceptible of only one inference and that inference is in favor of the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is reached only when there is no dispute in the evidence and the fact-finder is able to come to only one logical conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.